Peter Murry
(GPEW rep to CoR) 22/10/2012
Report
back from Coalition of Resistance Europe Against Austerity Action Conference | October 21st
1) About
160+ attended. I do not think the GPTU rep (D.Rouxel), London Fed rep
(A.Garrett) and G.Left rep (S.Thompson) were able to attend this event, but I
met F.Bakht, A. Gray, S.Ennis and R.Phoenix there. There may also have been
other Greens who I did not know/see.
2) Video
livestream of the event is currently available at http://www.coalitionofresistance.org.uk/2012/10/live-coverage-of-europe-against-conference/
3) The
event’s full agenda is published at http://www.coalitionofresistance.org.uk/2012/10/europe-against-austerity-action-conference-sunday-21-october-11am-430pm/
4) It was initially addressed with a welcoming speech from Jimmy Kelly of unite, a speech from Jeremy Corbyn MP on the political
importance of the event and opposition to Austerity and a Quebec student leader
who described the unrelenting series of student demonstrations mounted by
Montreal students against a gov’t imposed fees hike, which, with support from
rank and file trade unionists, succeeded in overthrowing a Liberal gov’t.
5) The morning plenary was addressed by Elisabeth Gauthier, Transform/Parti
Communiste Francais, James Meadway, New
Economics Foundation, , Stathis Kouvelakis, SYRIZA,
Greece and Myriam Bourgy, CADTM, Belgium, followed by brief
questions and discussion including a contribution from Dave Hopper (NE region NUM) who described the solidarity
actions against Austerity by
Durham miners supporting miners in Asturias (Spain).
6) I attended the afternoon session No to neoliberal education
with Alex Kenny, National
Union of Teachers, Haralambos Kokkinos, DOE primary teachers trade union (Greece),
and a Quebec Student representative, a French teacher trades unionist,
Dominique ? also spoke. There seemed to be a Europe
wide education austerity agenda described as “neoliberal”.
In Greece only 40 teachers had been recruited recently when about 2-3,000
were needed; there were forced school mergers; free text books, teacher
training and in-service training had all been abolished; there were reports of
teachers having to appeal to parents for, or pay themselves for, basic supplies
(eg toilet rolls), and of pupils passing out in school from under-nourishment.
In France the situation had slightly
improved with the Hollande gov’t, under Sarkozy 40,000 teaching jobs had been
lost and a few were being replaced. The French teacher unions were
demanding a raising of the school leaving age to 18, but there were threats to
reduce it to 14 or 15, except for an élite.
Alex
Kenny, National Union
of Teachers, stated that
Gove had an agenda of Academising or freeschooling every school in England and Wales ,
but he also pointed out that the UK gov’t agenda involved increasing,
often self-contradictory, micro management controls over teachers and the curriculum.
AK also noted the recent gov’t dictated GCSE grade changes which seemed to
indicate a reversion away from meritocracy towards a quota system which
rationed HE access and educational attainment. If this is so, it echoes the
French trends (see above) and indicates that some aspects of current
governmental educational agendas are not, strictly speaking,
neo-liberal, but actually reactionary.
7)
Because
I went to the education session I missed the better
attended session
on “The Shape Of The Resistance” with billed speakers Danielle Obono, Front
de Gauche (France), Kevin Courtney, National
Union of Teachers, Jeremy Corbyn MP, &
Florian Wilde, Die
Linke, (Germany ).
Perhaps one of the other Greens who went there could provide a report?
8)
The closing plenary: “Actions, co-operation and the timeline to
Athens 2013” was
addressed by Marisa Matias MEP, Bloco, (Portugal) and European Left Party,
Fred Leplat CoR, Dot Gibson, National
Pensioners’ Convention (personal
capacity), Natalie Bennett, Green Party, Vladimir Nieddu, SUD
Sante, (France) followed by brief questions and discussion.
The salient
points made and not made, here, and during the whole conference, seemed to me
to be:
a)
Those who were suffering from Austerity
were not to blame for it. In particular the stereotyping of some of the
southern Europeans (esp., the Greeks?) as “lazy” was an inaccurate slur and
evidence was cited to demonstrate this. It was also noted that economic
inequality was increasing in Germany .
b)
Austerity was presented as economic necessity but
was actually an attempt to restructure socio-economically towards a neo-liberal
or even an elitist model. Some speakers cited how a programme of
nationalisation and the creation of the welfare state was carried out after WW2
in the UK
when its financial situation was possibly worse than now.
c)
Austerity could be resisted by united action and
this has been successful in some cases (esp. Quebec ).
d)
In the UK , demos were not enough. Some
thought the fact that several TU leaders had called for a general strike at the
Hyde Park rally on 20/10 was a step in the
“right” direction.
e)
Non sectarian unity was repeatedly stressed, most
anti Austerity organisations (including Syriza and Bloco), were coalitions of
previously disparate parties, unions, the disabled, interest groups.
f)
There was little mention of Eire .
g)
There was little mention of environmental crisis
(in the sessions that I attended or in Natalie Bennett’s speech) except for a representative
of Hackney Transition who did remind the conference of it. There was some talk
of future infrastructural projects as an element in a possible recovery but no
mention that these could be used to create a low-carbon economy. (I regret not speaking up about this).
h)
Also the possible role of environmental crisis in
creating a profits famine and innvestment strike which, some said were causes
of the recent economic crash, was not mentioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment